|
Posted by Christopher Brandsdal on May 8, 2006, 2:03 pm
Please log in for more thread options True, Roger.
Thanks for "opening my eyes" :-)
>I see, as I was thinking of a corp webserver, rather than of
> a webhosting hosting server. The protection, since in theory
> the authors of webs should only be able to cause execution
> by the backside accounts of their web, any damage from the
> upload of an infected file would be limited to harm visited upon
> the browsing public of their webs or storage/processes write
> accessible to/by their backside accounts.
>
>> Totally agree with you, Roger.
>> But the thing is that it's used as a commercial server with about 300 FTP
>> users. That's why I think i should use AV.
>> Installed Norton Antivirus now.. Sad to know of the perfermence-loss, but
>> what to do about that? I think with that many usesers able to upload
>> files to the server, I need to have AV.. Or am I just way out? hehe
>>
>>
>>>> Hi!
>>>>
>>>> I'm setting up a new windows 2003 standard edition x64 as a webserver
>>>> tomorrow.
>>>> The server is not in network with other servers or computers.
>>>>
>>>> What kind of antivirus software should I use?
>>>>
>>>> What is there to choose of in x64?
>>>> Have looked at Symantec AntiVirus Corporate Edition 10.0, but it looks
>>>> like it is for a bunch of client-computers...
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Christopher Brandsdal
>>>
>>> You may have good reason, but I am curious, why do you feel
>>> that you need to lug a server down with anti-virus? It is not as
>>> if it would be used as a fileserver, and AV does have a way of
>>> hurting performance, so what is cause of the preceived need?
>>> Consider, if the server is used as a server (i.e. no IE/OE) and
>>> content is only promoted in controlled fashion from known
>>> clean machines, how could it get a virus ?
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
| 
XML Sitemap