Click here to get back home

17" WXGA vs WSXGA vs WUXGA ?

 HomeNewsGroups | Search | About
 comp.sys.laptops    Post an article   get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content
Subject Author Date
17" WXGA vs WSXGA vs WUXGA ? Lou 06-02-2007
Get Chitika Premium
Posted by Lou on June 2, 2007, 5:46 pm
Please log in for more thread options
I have been looking at 17" laptops (< $2000) for photos, DVD
movies, GPS/map programs and some internet use. All the
laptops in the stores are the WXGA 1440 x 900 size, but you
can order hp with WSXGA or Dell and Gateway with WUXGA
screens for only about $50-$100 more. So I have not been
able to see any of the higher resolution screens to compare
myself.
The WSXGA and WUSGA seem like they would be a lot better for
photos, but what are the cons? Does the text get too small
for most users and/or is there a problem with response time
for movies, viewing angle or contrast?

Thanks,
Lou



Posted by Roy on June 2, 2007, 8:50 pm
Please log in for more thread options
> I have been looking at 17" laptops (< $2000) for photos, DVD
> movies, GPS/map programs and some internet use. All the
> laptops in the stores are the WXGA 1440 x 900 size, but you
> can order hp with WSXGA or Dell and Gateway with WUXGA
> screens for only about $50-$100 more. So I have not been
> able to see any of the higher resolution screens to compare
> myself.
> The WSXGA and WUSGA seem like they would be a lot better for
> photos, but what are the cons? Does the text get too small
> for most users and/or is there a problem with response time
> for movies, viewing angle or contrast?
>
> Thanks,
> Lou
Photos and movies?
I never had problems with my 1920 x1200 pixel 17 inch screen....yes
the text get smaller but there is an installed magnifier where you can
just press the button( on top of the keyboard) if you want larger
text.
The viewing angle , contrast and response time were excellent. In
conclusion the pictures were so sharp and oustanding and HD Quality
BTW this particular unit is a Sony , I can't vouch for others...I had
other notebooks ranging from 13.3-15 from other brands but I never
bother about their picture quality as I use it for other common
purposes.


Posted by Lou on June 3, 2007, 1:48 am
Please log in for more thread options

>> I have been looking at 17" laptops (< $2000) for photos,
>> DVD
>> movies, GPS/map programs and some internet use. All the
>> laptops in the stores are the WXGA 1440 x 900 size, but
>> you
>> can order hp with WSXGA or Dell and Gateway with WUXGA
>> screens for only about $50-$100 more. So I have not been
>> able to see any of the higher resolution screens to
>> compare
>> myself.
>> The WSXGA and WUSGA seem like they would be a lot better
>> for
>> photos, but what are the cons? Does the text get too
>> small
>> for most users and/or is there a problem with response
>> time
>> for movies, viewing angle or contrast?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Lou
> Photos and movies?
> I never had problems with my 1920 x1200 pixel 17 inch
> screen....yes
> the text get smaller but there is an installed magnifier
> where you can
> just press the button( on top of the keyboard) if you want
> larger
> text.
> The viewing angle , contrast and response time were
> excellent. In
> conclusion the pictures were so sharp and oustanding and
> HD Quality
> BTW this particular unit is a Sony , I can't vouch for
> others...I had
> other notebooks ranging from 13.3-15 from other brands
> but I never
> bother about their picture quality as I use it for other
> common
> purposes.
>

I will use it mostly when on vacations traveling by car so
17" should be ok since it does not need to be carried much.
I do some hobby photography and bring DVD movies or recorded
TV shows to watch (spoiled by Tivo and commercial skip, plus
some places do not have much TV). Do a lot of hiking and
like to play with GPS and map software so bigger screen and
resolution should be a lot less scrolling.

The Sony looks nice but I think they cost a lot more than
the ones I am looking at. I searched the internet reviews a
bit and have seen only a few complaints of text too small
with 1920 x 1200 screens.

Thanks.



Similar ThreadsPosted
wxga vs wsxga vs wuxga for text? August 15, 2005, 11:11 pm
Display Resolutions: WXGA, WSXGA etc. My Recent Shoping Experience April 2, 2007, 11:54 am
Dell Latitude D820 upgrde from WXGA to WUXGA..possible? April 26, 2007, 12:49 pm
15" vs 17". Is one better if both WXGA? February 20, 2006, 2:23 am
Laptop with 14' WXGA screen and better video October 17, 2005, 5:13 pm
Switching laptopscreen (WXGA) to external LCDscreen (X)GA August 28, 2006, 11:40 am
swapping WSXGA+ displays between two laptops August 31, 2005, 3:58 pm
Compariosn in quality between 14.1 SXGA+ TFT and 15.4 WSXGA+ TFT September 4, 2007, 11:00 am
WUXGA on a 15.4" screen? October 15, 2005, 3:02 pm
Toshiba Satellite WUXGA? December 15, 2004, 3:44 pm

Our other projects:

Art Dolls, Fairies and Mermaids - Sunnyfaces.net

Roy's Linux, Programming and Search Engines messages

1-Script XML SitemapXML Sitemap